Was Calvin Coolidge a Good President?
If you’re wondering, “Was Calvin Coolidge a good president?” then you’ve come to the right place. This article will discuss Coolidge’s laissez-faire approach, his political courage, and His ability to tap into the minds of the American public. But it also goes beyond those three factors to explore the man’s qualities as a good president.
Coolidge’s laissez-faire approach
The stock market crash of 1929 was a wake-up call for the nation. President Coolidge was a New Englander who preferred a laissez-faire approach to government. He opposed any interference in the markets and cut taxes for many people. The stock market crash of 1929, however, was a direct result of this extreme laissez-faire approach to government. Similarly, Coolidge failed to impose banking restrictions, which led to bad investments and a weakened economy.
Some historians have accused Coolidge of liberalizing the economy and promoting laissez-faire policies. But the former president was hardly a laissez-faire liberal or a non-interventionist libertarian. In his excellent biography, Robert A. Woods argues that Coolidge championed a progressive platform and took up Harding’s agenda.
The reason for Coolidge’s laissez-fraîche approach to government was that he grew up in a farming town with little access to markets. He studied law in a free library and he served in numerous elected positions in western Massachusetts. In spite of his lack of political experience, his belief in America helped him survive. He won a re-election in 1924 but he declined to run for president again in 1928, arguing that he would be a bad president.
The Roaring Twenties saw tremendous economic growth, technological innovation, and social change. After World War I and Woodrow Wilson’s League of Nations, the U.S. was rebuilding. The post-war boom created a new American empire, which was the first to experience one of its most prosperous periods. The Roaring Twenties also saw the commercialization of countless modern inventions.
While this laissez-faire approach to government was far from perfect, the US economy had plenty of problems during the Roaring Twenties, and Coolidge’s laissez-fraîc approach was a good solution. The economy, which had a significant budget deficit, was not in crisis when Coolidge took office. In fact, he was a net gainer.
His political courage
One of the most infamous examples of Coolidge’s political courage is his stance against the Boston police strike in 1919. After the police struck and the city became chaotic, Coolidge backed the police commissioner and called off the strike. His stance on the issue of the Boston police strike garnered national attention and was hailed as an act of political courage. He proclaimed that there was no right to strike against public safety and upheld the police commissioner.
Another example of Coolidge’s political courage is his tax program, which was his major legislative achievement during 1926. While this tax program was his best year in Congress, Coolidge also won on several other issues. Despite the fact that Prohibition was still an issue, Coolidge avoided it by staying in the middle of the wets and drys. This allowed him to avoid the criticism of his political opponents and maintain support for his policies.
In 1923, a number of Afro-Americans were killed during the Black Strike. The President and Governor encouraged Congress to pass a bill against lynching. The biracial commission he proposed helped settle southern black migrants in northern industrialized areas. In addition, the Layton bill helped ease the transition of workers from rural to urban areas. This initiative was critical to his political courage, and his actions will be remembered for years to come.
Another example of Coolidge’s political courage is his decision to suspend his presidential campaign after Harding’s death. Although Coolidge did not campaign on the issue of slavery, he was able to attack the issue forcefully when he took office. While most presidents would have resigned, Coolidge did not, as he was too weak to do so. In other words, he was unprepared for the presidency and his son’s death had led to his emergence as the next president.
Moreover, the president of the United States was one of the first presidents to be elected to the White House. But he knew that he would have been resoundingly defeated. He was a Republican and faced a lame-duck session in the 68th congress. Despite this setback, Coolidge made clear that he would not abandon his legislative goals. For example, he did not discourage Senate Republicans from stripping La Follette of her committee seniority.
His laissez-faire foreign policy
While President Calvin Coolidge’s laissez faire foreign policy was criticized as a failure of the American political system, his administration was not without success. Its laissez-faire approach to foreign affairs and economy helped it win a landslide election in 1924, and it set a precedent for American foreign policy for decades to come. A laissez-faire foreign policy approach allows governments to act independently, and it is more beneficial to the United States than to other countries.
While advocating laissez-faire foreign policy, Coolidge opposed many of President Woodrow Wilson’s policies. For example, he opposed the Veterans Bonus Bill, which would have compensated First World War veterans for their lost wages. However, Congress overrode his veto. The Dawes Plan remained in effect until Coolidge signed the Kellogg-Briand Pact in 1928, which banned war as a foreign policy.
When it comes to foreign policy, there are two main philosophies. One is laissez-faire and the other is free market. The former favored free trade and laissez-faire foreign policy, ensuring the country’s prosperity. Coolidge’s laissez-faire foreign policy sought to protect the American economy while also ensuring that businesses could flourish. Similarly, a laissez-faire foreign policy tries to balance economic interests with cultural values.
A laissez-faire foreign policy aims to preserve the freedom of the individual to decide his own destiny. Coolidge also supported US membership in the League of Nations and encouraged trade with other nations. His laissez-faire foreign policy helped restore the confidence of Americans in the federal government after the scandals of Harding’s administration. Coolidge’s laissez-faire foreign policy was praised by the Wall Street Journal, which praised him for his approach.
The twentieth century was a turbulent time in American history. Coolidge led the nation through the Roaring Twenties, a time of great social, economic, and technological change. The nation was reconstructed after World War I, with both the League of Nations and a non-interventionist approach. The Roaring 20s were a time of unprecedented economic growth, but the era of Cold War politics was also marked by a series of scandals.
His ability to tap directly into the public mind
When it comes to his presidential record, Coolidge is viewed as a transitional figure in American history. He embodied small-town values while embracing modern culture and technology. His approach to politics was pragmatic, embracing a minimal government while celebrating economic prosperity. However, he remained quiet about controversies that arose during his term as president.
He eluded the Senate majority leader Henry Cabot Lodge and chose executive posts over legislative ones. His efforts were met with frustration, as both Coolidge and Lodge had preferred to serve in executive positions. But despite his frustrations with the Senate majority leader, Coolidge nevertheless won the presidency in 1924. In addition to his ability to tap directly into the public mind, Coolidge was also a good communicator.
Coolidge’s domestic agenda revolved around tax cuts. His Treasury Secretary Andrew Mellon was an advocate of supply-side economics, a theory that states and cities should bear the costs of floods. However, Coolidge balked at federal legislation to fund flood relief. His steadfast stance on this issue eventually led to a compromise.
On his last day in office, Coolidge strode through the Arch of Armory. One hundred soldiers waited in the basement, awaiting the president to enter. The State Guard was out in force by Wednesday, and Peters called the press to complain about a lack of co-operation and practical suggestions. He claimed authority under an old statute and called up citizen volunteers.