LeetCode Vs AlgoExpert vs HackerRank Review

LeetCode Vs AlgoExpert vs HackerRank

LeetCode Vs AlgoExpert vs HackerRank Review

The difference between LeetCode and AlgoExpert lies in the difficulty of the problems they present. Algorithms can be hard to understand, so you may find it difficult to understand one-line solutions. Besides, LeetCode is geared more toward experienced professionals and developers, so students may find it difficult to keep up. But AlgoExpert’s problems range from easy to difficult, making them equally suitable for students and professionals.


A side by side comparison of HackerRank and LeetCode reveals that the former is better suited for absolute beginners. Unlike LeetCode, which is intended for intermediate-level coders, HackerRank has comprehensive tracks and introduces different concepts and programming languages. Some graduate Data Science programs begin with HackerRank challenges to lay the foundation for the rest of their courses. Moreover, HackerRank delves deeper into Data Science than LeetCode, with its puzzle-like questions. However, HackerRank does not prove to be an ideal tool for advanced coders and has some problems in the format and quality of its problems.

LeetCode is a popular website to practice coding with its wide range of questions. It allows users to search for questions and solutions and sort them by skill level. In addition to that, LeetCode provides solutions to many problems. Moreover, users can discuss problems on the community forum. Both HackerRank and LeetCode have discussions boards, where users can exchange their opinions and get additional support. Moreover, HackerRank provides a variety of pricing plans for employers.

HackerRank has an extensive community of programmers and users, who can become instructors and students. It also offers job opportunities in universities for its users. Leetcode, on the other hand, offers a more extensive learning experience. But for those who are not yet sure which is the better choice, we recommend comparing HackerRank and Leetcode before you choose a tool. The two tools complement each other.

For those who are looking for a comprehensive algorithm question platform, LeetCode may be the better option. Its questions and answer databases include 160 coding interview questions across 15 categories. In addition, it offers a 25% discount on multiple purchases. Its questions and algorithms are well-rounded and useful, allowing data scientists to practice their skills with a minimal investment. However, HackerRank and LeetCode aren’t ideal for developers looking to start a career in data science.

See also  How to unblur chegg answers with inspect element or delete a question in 2022

The comparison of HackerRank vs Leetcode is often a tough one. HackerRank is better for those with a low level of experience, while Leetcode is more suitable for professionals. In terms of difficulty, Leetcode is better for those who are looking to polish their programming skills. They both have their strengths and weaknesses, but which one should you choose? Weigh these two side by side to decide which one is best for you.


There are some significant differences between LeetCode and AlgoExpert. While AlgoExpert is more user-friendly, LeetCode focuses more on explaining complex algorithms in one-line code. Although both platforms offer a rich coding environment, LeetCode has more problem questions than AlgoExpert. AlgoExpert has a limited problem set, only covering nine languages, while LeetCode offers over a thousand problems. The two platforms also offer different ways to approach problems, including video explanations and discussion boards.

Besides the question bank, both sites offer algorithms and data structures help. The latter has more than one thousand problems, ranging from easy to medium to difficult. However, while AlgoExpert has over 160 problems, LeetCode’s question bank is over 1400 questions in various difficulty levels. It is important to note that these problems are user-submitted, so the quality may not be the same as AlgoExpert’s.

As mentioned earlier, AlgoExpert is the better tool for organized practice. LeetCode, on the other hand, features over 1000 problem sets and allows you to practice on them for a day. LeetCode users often spend three months practicing for interviews. In addition to LeetCode’s free version, the premium version offers the option to simulate interviews from specific companies. Most people who attempt this program crack their coding interview after solving 300-400 LeetCode problems.

While AlgoExpert offers a curated list of questions curated by ex-Google and Facebook engineers, it is also not ideal for coding interviews. However, this platform is best suited for practicing coding skills and experimenting with new concepts. While LeetCode does have an abundance of over 1400 coding questions, AlgoExpert is better for coding hobbyists. This software also provides a variety of resources for beginners.

Another notable difference between AlgoExpert and LeetCode is the difficulty level of the problem sets. Both services offer coding practice to help users pass technical interviews. AlgoExpert, however, provides the most comprehensive database of questions with a range of levels of difficulty. LeetCode has over 1,000 questions categorized into Easy, Medium, and Hard. In addition, LeetCode provides access to the largest tech community in the world. And as a community, it is extremely useful for learning the different paradigms and solving problems from a wide range of Computer Science domains.

See also  5 best tips to excel in programming Homework


When it comes to coding courses, there are many different options to choose from. LeetCode has a very broad question set, while AlgoExpert has a more focused problem set. Which is better? That depends on your learning style and the type of problem you’re looking to tackle. In this article, we’ll explore both options and weigh the pros and cons of each. LeetCode: A popular choice among engineers. It provides thousands of problem questions to practice on. It also has a huge community of tech experts and engineers who can offer support and help.

For those who are more advanced, both programs offer a premium option that features additional help. Premium members can access a data structure and algorithm tutorial, and there are over 1400 problems to choose from. These range from easy to medium to hard. By comparison, AlgoExpert only offers 160+ problems. Premium members can also receive weekly contests and other incentives. However, if you need help in algorithm development, AlgoExpert is the way to go.

Both sites have their pros and cons, but both are good for developing coding skills. LeetCode provides many challenges, with many solutions, and it ranks its questions by difficulty. In addition to daily challenges, it also provides a blog with extensive articles. The platform also offers a community message board. For those who aren’t interested in coding lessons, AlgoExpert has a job board with listings worldwide. For one year, the service costs $119.

The main difference between AlgoExpert and Leetcode is their goal. AlgoExpert is designed for coding interview preparation and features 150+ questions curated by Facebook and Google engineers. HackerRank is more geared towards practicing coding skills and trying new concepts. LeetCode, meanwhile, is a great choice for coding hobbyists. It has over 1400 questions for beginners and professionals alike.

Although both of these platforms are excellent for interview preparation, there are some advantages and disadvantages to each program. Leetcode offers better question selection, and both can help you deepen your understanding of topics and develop problem-solving skills. Although C++ and Java are the most popular programming languages, AlgoExpert can help you gain a deeper understanding of these languages. Depending on your job, you can choose one over the other if you are interested in advancing your career in data science.

See also  Free Courses Online With Certificates in 2022-2023


You might be asking how does InterviewCake compare to Leetcode. Ultimately, it’s a matter of personal preference. Nevertheless, both offer a wealth of information and a risk-free money-back guarantee. Leetcode’s database contains more than 20,000 interview questions, and Interview Cake’s more than 50 practice problems give you a realistic shot at aceing your interview.

Compared to Leetcode, Interview Cake focuses on problem-solving instead of memorizing facts. Instead of giving you a solution, it shows you a variety of methods and strategies that can help you approach the problem and answer it with ease. However, it may not be as useful for you if you need to ask a lot of questions about your approach to the problem. Luckily, it recently added a Slack community to help users discuss the software and get help.

Unlike LeetCode, Interview Cake has over 50 programming questions, and provides hints natively in the questions. Because it’s natively integrated, the platform encourages you to persist in tackling a problem. However, it’s important to understand that mock interviews are only valuable when you’ve already developed strong problem-solving skills. LeetCode Premium, on the other hand, lets you pair with another user and let him supply the questions.

LeetCode is a “gateway FAANG drug” for tech job applicants. It boasts an extensive database of over 2100 questions, many of them submitted by users. Unfortunately, the questions are not always correct. Nevertheless, LeetCode is the gold standard for interview preparation. If you have the time, you can master the site and find yourself in the 200K+ compensation club. But, as I said, mastering LeetCode will require a couple of weekends to get the hang of.

AlgoExpert has a lot more questions to choose from, ranging from easy to difficult. Its question pool will challenge new interviewers and not be limited by repetition. However, you might find it difficult to decide between LeetCode and InterviewCake. For those who value comprehensiveness, LeetCode is the more useful of the two. The other two apps, HackerRank and InterviewCake, do not provide enough practice material to be an effective preparation tool.