Are Ravenclaw and Slytherin the two sides of the same coin?

0
176
Are Ravenclaw and Slytherin the two sides of the same coin?

Are Ravenclaw and Slytherin the two sides of the same coin?

You may have also noticed that Ravenclaw and Slytherin apartments share many characteristics. From the emphasis on intelligence to the clear preference for ambitious students, these two houses have a lot in common. They seem to have some overlap in their student populations as well. However, what if they aren’t as opposite as they seem? What if Ravenclaw and Slytherin are identical houses? These five ways shed light on how Ravenclaw and Slytherin are the same!

How does it feel to be in Gryffindor, Hufflepuff, or Ravenclaw?

There are three types of people in Hogwarts: those who do well at school, those who don’t do well at school but have a talent for something else (like sport), and those who enjoy causing trouble. Of course, they’re not necessarily mutually exclusive. Some characters embody these traits to varying degrees, often with quite a lot of overlap. What might be an exciting Slytherin ambition to some might be a fun bit of mischief to others. And we all know that you can get good grades without being clever if you work hard enough. So, where does your allegiance lie? Are you proud to be a Gryffindor, or is it time for you to embrace your inner Ravenclaw? Or would you rather hang out with Hagrid in his hut?

House stereotypes

The basic stereotypes we usually hear about these houses are that Slytherins value ambition, cunning, and blood purity. And in contrast, Gryffindors are daring, chivalrous—and pure of heart. In short: Gryffindors believe in doing what’s right no matter what, while members of Slytherin House put their desires first. But how accurate is that assessment? Do these schools operate along a light/dark line, or are there some similarities? Let’s look at those qualities mentioned above on a house-by-house basis.

Introverts vs. Extroverts

So several people have to spend time alone or in larger clusters than it is at large social gatherings. Surveys show that extroverts make up about 20% of society. Extroverts are fun-loving, upbeat, cheerful, and excitable individuals who thrive in big crowds. They tend to be highly charismatic because they’re comfortable meeting new people and making conversation. In comparison, introverts are quiet types who prefer doing things alone or with one or two close friends. Despite their reserved nature, they’re just as interesting as extroverts–they communicate differently!

When introverts and extroverts collide

Every extrovert is different, but you can expect many personality traits among them: They’re friendly, optimistic, and adventurous. In contrast, introverts are typically quieter, more reserved, and need more time alone to recharge. While they might seem very different at first glance, they have a lot in common—perhaps even more than we realize. Here are a few ways extroverts and introverts are similar.

The critical difference between introverts and extroverts is not just about where you get your energy. Although different things energize both types of people, they both require energy to function at their best—and it all comes down to how they prefer to gather that energy.

Extroverts draw their power from interacting with others while doing something active or enjoying themselves (like going out for dinner). Introverts generally get their point from being alone or doing solitary activities (like reading a book). For example, an extrovert may get energized by spending time with friends over drinks after work. At the same time, an introvert may find themselves recharging after taking a long walk at lunchtime with no distractions.

The great news is that there have been numerous ways for introverts and extroverts to work together more effectively

When introverts work with extroverts in group settings, extroverts tend to monopolize conversations. This is a challenge because introverts can feel invisible or left out of critical discussions if they’re not invited to contribute. One way to combat that is to make sure that every person gets a chance to share their ideas—but it can be hard for leaders who are naturally more outgoing than others. You need other people who help draw out participation from quieter team members to solve that problem.

That might mean taking time at meetings to ask each member what they think about an issue before moving on. It could also mean creating an environment where less talkative participants don’t have to worry about being embarrassed by speaking up too much (or too little). And introverts and extroverts alike need to give each other feedback after meetings, so everyone knows how they’re doing. For example, saying something like I appreciated how you asked my opinion on that idea goes a long way toward building trust between coworkers of different personality types.

But first, let’s do some myth-busting!

While many memes are floating around these days comparing Harry Potter’s Hogwarts Houses to our most-loved personality types, there is one in particular that we want to take issue with: The idea that Gryffindor = Extraversion, Hufflepuff = Agreeableness, Ravenclaw = Openness, and Slytherin = Neuroticism. In short: This myth isn’t true. Yes, J.K. Rowling based her four house descriptions on existing personality theories by well-known psychologists like Carl Jung and David Keirsey—but she did it in a very loose way (she later said it was more or less random).

You don’t have to be brave to be a Gryffindor! You don’t have to be smart to be in Ravenclaw! And you certainly don’t need any negative traits to make it into Slytherin. It just doesn’t work that way. But what does work? What does each of these houses represent? We’re glad you asked.

Conclusion:

Are Gryffindor, Hufflepuff, Ravenclaw, and Slytherin all traits that represent people within us? Suppose someone is motivated by survival or social perceptions, or appearance. In that case, it is indeed convenient to see how they might have a bias toward Slytherins. But it’s also possible to be ambitious while remaining kind or community-oriented while still gone. These aren’t dichotomies but dimensions that exist along a continuum within everyone. As Rowling says in her first Pottermore essay: It is our choices. that show what we indeed are, far more than our abilities.