Dragon Slayer 5e vs Ranger Hunter in D&D
As STR-based Ranger, you should consider how you will survive encounters as you don’t have Heavy armor proficiency. With no focusing on DEX, your AC probably won’t be that high. Dual-wielding would rule out a Shield. For that reason alone you may vote for the Duelist Monster Slayer 5e alternative combined with wielding a Shield. You may find 5e Monster Slayer subclass, in general, is much more appealing than Ranger Hunter 5e.
Horizon Walker would likely work nicely as STR established Ranger too. It employs a lot of its Bonus Action so dual-wielding wouldn’t be an excellent choice for this.
Among the things which stands out to me as the basic principles of a Monster Hunter is that you are not a monster. You’re a tiny creature compared to them. One slip up and they’d eat you with ease. A monster hunter would use every tool possible to level the playing area. It can be Nets, traps, poisons, etc. You will be searching for anything which will help you take off your prey.
Visit: Game on Comics
Wielding a Shield
Your primary tool is going to be knowledge. You need to send you free time studying everything you can about the world’s various creatures and how best to search them.
Suppose you are wielding a Shield or are dual-wielding. You’re likely to want the Warcaster feat so you can fulfil the Somatic part of your spells without needing to lose your weapon every time. Potentially also Shield Coaching to use it to achieve that the Material part of your spells. Ensure your charms and what components they require (Hunter’s Mark has a Voice component, Absorb Element only has a Somatic component, etc.).
Monster Slayer 5E
The Monster Slayer specializes in defeating a single danger. They look at one individual and mess up them. That’s been the Ranger’s highest quality. 5e Hunter’s Mark being one of the most acceptable ways to blow someone up — so they do the Ranger’s work well. But, and maybe more importantly, the Monster Slayer 5e offers a ton of methods to guard against magical. That’s something quite powerful because Ranger’s do not get counterspell or adequate anti-magic by default.
5e Monster Slayer Conclave
You committed yourself to search down monsters of the night and wielders of gloomy magic. A monster slayer seeks out vampires, dragons, evil fey, fiends, and other magic threats. Trained in supernatural techniques to overcome such monsters, slayers are pros at unearthing and beating powerful, mystical foes.
The Monster Slayer in 5e is up with all the Abjuration Wizard as one of the best countering casters’ choices. The ability to rapidly and effectively deal with targets is the Ranger’s favourite pastime, and this course fully embraces that. If you want someone to Take Care of casters and, therefore, overlook a damage-focused personality, the Monster Slayer is perfect.
Dexterity: Ranger 5e & Monster Slayer
The Monster Slayer requires both Dexterity and Wisdom; Rangers do better-using Dexterity than Strength in almost all scenarios. Wisdom needs for Monster Sense along with your spell DC, so your Magic User’s Nemesis functions more frequently. If you plan on performing the melee construct, you may need the Constitution to stay alive.
Monster Slayer 5e Magic
Starting at 3rd level, you learn an additional spell when you achieve certain levels in this course, as shown at the Dragon Slayer Spells table. The spell counts as a ranger spell for you, but it doesn’t count against the number of ranger spells you understand.
At 3rd level, you acquire the ability to peer at a creature and magically discern how best to hurt it. As an action, select one monster you can see within 60 ft of you. You immediately learn whether the creature has some harm immunities, resistances, or vulnerabilities and what they are. Suppose the beast hides from divination magic. You sense it doesn’t have any damage immunities, resistances, or vulnerabilities. You regain all expended uses of this when you complete a very long break.
At 3rd level, you can focus your ire on a single foe, increasing the harm you inflict on it. As a bonus action, you designate a single monster you can see within 60 feet of you as the feature’s goal. Each turn you hit that target with a weapon assault requires an extra 1d6 damage from the weapon. That advantage lasts till you finish a short or long break. It ends early if you designate a different creature.
At 7th level, you gain more resilience against your prey’s assaults in your body and mind. Whenever your Slayer’s Prey goal compels you to make a saving throw and whenever you make an ability check to escape that target’s grapple, add 1d6 to your roster.
At 11th level, you gain the ability to thwart someone else’s magic. When you see a monster casting a spell or teleporting within 60 feet of you, you may use your response to attempt to foil it magically. The creature must succeed on a Wisdom saving throw against your spell save DC, or its attack or teleport fails and wastes. Once you use this feature, you can not use it until you finish a short or long rest.
At 15th level, you acquire the ability to counterattack as soon as your prey tries to sabotage you. If the target of your Slayer’s Prey forces you to make a saving throw, you may use your reaction to create one weapon attack against the quarry. You generate this assault immediately before making the saving throw. If the attack hits, your save automatically succeeds, along with the attack’s expected consequences.
Finest Races for Dragon Slayer 5e Rangers
The Monster Slayer needs both Dexterity and Wisdom; Rangers fared better using Dexterity than Strength in just about all scenarios. Wisdom is necessary for Monster Sense and your spell DC. Therefore your Magic User’s Nemesis works more frequently. If you plan on doing the melee build, you may want Constitution to stay alive.
The regular 5e Ranger, Wood Elves are a stellar selection for you. As an elf, you’re automatically proficient in Perception. (something every Ranger needs) You are among the very best nighttime guards with Trance, and therefore are good against charms and sleep spells. Your forest background grants you extra walking pace and the ability to conceal while just kind of within nature’s boundaries.
The primary Player’s Handbook version human is always magnificent. If you would like to go melee in cases like this, you might want to utilize them. That also lets you take a feat. Sentinel is perfect for ensuring that a caster can not escape you and making a massive threat for them. They will feel incentivized to fight you, and you add d6 to your rescue and hurt them plenty. You might have the ability to win races, even against potent bosses! If not, it is possible to take other feats, such as Sharpshooter or Crossbow Master, to take these creatures down from afar, without sacrificing an ability to score growth.
Is it true that the Monster Slayer 5e ranger’s Supernatural Defense feature advantage Constitution saving throws you make to maintain concentration?
Officially, the Sage Advice Compendium report states that Supernatural Defense does assist with preserving concentration. The 5e Monster Slayer ranger’s 7th-level attribute, Supernatural Defense (XGtE, p. 43), says the following. If you take damage while focusing on a spell, you must make a Constitution saving throw to maintain concentration.
It is rather unlike the SAC doc to say a response. Again it is without any excuse as to why that is the solution. So while this is the official judgment and is probably also the way the feature intended to work, I do not find the evidence they provided (none) particularly persuasive.
Supernatural Defense might not help with maintaining concentration.
When must the wizard 5e choose to over channel?” Suppose something says “When you throw a Wizard spell that deals damage.” It does not mean that you wait to see whether the spell deals damage. You decide to use Over channel immediately when casting the spell.
Thus we must understand if the spell deals damage before its effects occur (otherwise how can we know what spells qualify for Over channel?). The only way to understand this is the spell’s description. Thus, a spell that does not deal damage usually but happens to move a creature on a damaging area does not suddenly count as “a spell that deals damage”. Whether such a place existed is out the spell’s control. What’s forcing you to take damage isn’t the spell, but the field of effect.
The Sorcerer’s Careful Spell Metamagic uses similar wording, saying the following. If you throw a spell that forces other monsters to make a saving throw, then you can protect a few of those creatures from the spell’s full force.
Similarly, we have to suppose the spell forces a saving throw before its effects occur. (otherwise, how do we know what attacks are eligible for Careful Spell); the only way to understand this is the spell’s description. Therefore, a spell which doesn’t cause a saving throw usually but happens to damage a monster that’s concentrating on a charm doesn’t abruptly count as”a spell which forces a saving throw”. Whether the target was focusing is outside of the spell’s control. What’s forcing you to make the saving throw isn’t the spell, but the harm.
That also prevents the odd situation using Concentration Spell on a spell such as a firebolt. It points towards saving throws to maintain concentration, not counting as forced from the spell.
You may not find any more significant link between a spell happening to manoeuvre a monster on a damaging area. And a spell occurring to damage a creature that’s focusing on a spell (neither consequences are beneath the spell’s controller. It is because they rely upon external forces). Suppose a spell result in a saving throw to keep immersion counted as “a spell that compels a saving throw.” A spell that moves a monster on a damaging area would count as “a spell that deals damage”, which is almost certainly incorrect.
A spell merely forces a creature to make a saving throw if the saving throw is a portion of the spell’s description. Maybe not if it only happens to lead to a saving throw.
All this debate extends to the Hunter feature. A creature moving you on a damaging region of effect would not count. It is because these forces you to take damage and a monster damaging. You wouldn’t count as these forcing you to make a saving throw to keep concentration. It wasn’t in their hands whether the damaging area exists or whether you’re focusing on a spell. So what do you think about Monster Slayer 5e?